The Standing Strong House – A review


Whakapapa is enduring, and no matter the circumstances you find yourself in, your whakapapa will see you through – and it is never irredeemable. That’s the take-home message I received from The Standing Strong House, a new children’s book from Reina Kahukiwa and illustrated by Robyn Kahukiwa.

Based around the story of hapū Ngāti Tū Māia, The Standing Strong house revolves around multiple generations, weaving our stories together in a way that celebrates tīpuna, mokopuna, Ātua, and kaitieki. This book provides learnings on our ancestral worlds, our survival of colonial interference, the Atua realms of the marae and wharenui, and our visual and performing arts. Reina Kahukiwa’s writing style provide easy interpretation of the reo in the book and therein lies another wonderful reo resource for all.

Robyn Kahukiwa treats us to a new vibrant, plaintive watercolour with every page. For those of you who, like me, came of age poring over Robyn Kahukiwa’s illustrations and artworks, introducing them to your daughters is a whakapapa experience in itself. I’ve read this book with my girls twice now. It spans centuries, with different phases to the story, and so we break the book up and read it over three nights. That way we also get to spend time looking at the artworks and practicing our reo as we describe them. My youngest enjoys touching the moko kauwae on the page, then touching my own moko kauwae, and it’s always my favourite moment.


We are seeds sown in the chiefly soils of Rangiātea. An immutable thread through time, and in our bones remain the minerals of the soil that our tipuna Hine-Ahu-One arose from. She, and all of our tipuna between her, and us, are carried within us. Colonial interference may distract us for a time, but whakapapa is a powerful thing, it will heal and it will re-weave. Sometimes it will take generations, but when the story of your people spans aeons, this is but a blink of an eye.

There are huge issues taken on by this book, just as there are huge issues taken on by us as a people. Colonial theft, urbanisation, homelessness, cultural desolation are all touched upon, as is our strength, beauty, courage, capacity for love, and resilience. As I consider the future for our mokopuna, I for one fully appreciated the honest and reassuring voice of The Strong Standing House, whispering to us as our own kuia have, that all hope is never lost, and no matter how dark the night, there will always be a dawn.

Korihi te manu, takiri mai i te ata. Ka ao, ka ao, ka awatea.
(The bird sings, the morning dawns, the day breaks through)

You can get your copy here.


If calling for Indigenous death is not hate speech, what the hell IS hate speech?


Getting real about hate, genocide, and human rights.
What a month for White Supremacy huh.

The Aryan circus act Southern & Molyneux (henceforth S&M for so many reasons) were to appear in Auckland, then they weren’t (because they were declined a venue and required a specially granted visa), then they were (after deciding to organise another venue and getting their visa), then they weren’t (it became too late and they couldn’t find one), and now… it appears, after finding a venue… they are, once more, back on our horizon.

Like a recurrent STD, or a slow approaching, indecisive, and very dense methane fog, they’re making their way here to speak out of their methane holes, and feed methane suggestions to equally dense methane-hungry turkeys who are ever so anxious to gobble it all up and turkey-waddle back to their clans and bur-kurk to each other about how Mowrees killed all the Morry-orrys and they should all be thanking us for saving them.

All in the name of validating their own continued presence on stolen land.

If you ever thought Aotearoa was racially progressive – this is the week to relieve yourself of such imaginings. Essentially their show consists of Molyneux arguing in favour of white colonialism, while Southern argues against cultural diversity. Shall I break that down a bit more? White people may export themselves to other countries, because it’s an improvement, but coloured people must remain in their country awaiting improvement from white colonizers.

And for WEEKS, we have had to listen to the following:

  1. There’s no proof that what S&M are at all racist
  2. There’s no proof that what they are promoting is hate speech
  3. Denying them entry, or a platform for their rhetoric, violates their right to free speech

lauren southern

Seriously – you don’t have to dig too hard to find their hate but it seems that it wasn’t enough, the “Fuck Islam” selfy was apparently not enough; nor was Southern’s open disgust at the presence of non-white people in Paris; nor was it enough when she joined right-wing groups in Europe to block rescue vessels from assisting drowning refugees; nor was Molyneux’s open promotion of eugenics. It begged the question what people needed to see for them to identify racism.

And then Simon Copland live tweeted from their Australian event, publicizing vile suggestions that First Nations Australians should be thankful for the experience of colonization. Erasing, and denying, the hundreds of Indigenous massacres throughout Australian history.

Now, anyone with fingers and a keyboard can find the facts of the matter about their racism… but then, facts seem to matter very little to the likes of Molyneux, or indeed his supporters. They characteristically present themselves as intellectuals, whilst paradoxically clinging to a version of history and reality that is radically divorced from accepted fact. They recognise their exceptionalism – but misunderstand it as being exceptionally bright (rather than exceptionally absurd).

And yet, still, even the live reports weren’t enough. Supporters still felt compelled to patronise others with their misunderstandings that freedom of speech required us to provide a public platform for even the most vile suggestions. This is not a matter of opinion we are talking about here – the concept of Freedom of Speech is clearly outlined in both national and international law as having limitations. Still – you confront them with this and they will merely pretend they didn’t see it.

racial disharmony

You see – many of these people are not in the slightest bit interested in the truth. They are not interested in justice, equity, or fairness. Indeed, they will see any scenario that does not retain, or increase, their relative privilege as an injustice upon them, the brave white martyrs. They will position themselves as the victims and play upon the notion of victimhood all the way up to, and including, inciting violence against the most vulnerable of our society.

And they are VERY well supported. They are well supported financially – and this should be no surprise, of course they will invest in protecting this system – it’s the one that has lined their pockets, and placed them in power for a long, long time. But they also have a broad social support base here in Aotearoa and this is important for us to talk about. Where the causes of Indigenous rights and environmental protection struggle to make their fundraising marks, the NZ Free Speech Coalition managed to raise $50,000NZD in just 24hrs (from how many donors is unclear but apparently thousands) for the likes of Don Brash and Cameron Slater to defend S&M’s right to present here in Auckland. Certainly social media comments seem to reflect a broad amount of people who support freedom of speech, and feel that it is being infringed by not allowing S&M a stage.

Many of the suggestions seem to carry over from the Make America Great Again campaign, that the “left” is broken, and unreasonable, and it is incumbent upon “good”, apolitical, middle-of-the-road folks, and the remainder of the left itself, to examine why so many are feeling disenfranchised and are turning to the right. Again, it’s the ‘reasonable’ thing to do.

And while certainly many Māori and Pacific Island whānau populate the ranks of the opposition – there are some who also support them having a stage, telling their story, who are happy to explore their perspective and have the debate – for the benefit of ALL. The suggestion from both sides seems to be that banning them, calling them racist, or using the term hate speech, is unfair, uncharitable, incorrect and short-changes the conversation.


First of all as I said it is NOT that difficult to understand how groups like this get financial support – they are generated by the recipients of privilege, and this is their primary interest group. Hyper-capitalism has also created huge wealth-poverty gaps in our communities so it becomes VERY easy to make scapegoats out of beneficiaries, out of refugees, and immigrants and cast them as a drain on community, as the cause of our lack of wealth. They then position themselves as victims and court those who consider themselves a-political, including the significant population of those who find it much easier to be validated by racist falsehoods than confront issues of race and privilege, particularly when they fear being cast as a part of the problem.

In short – they’re not getting support by virtue of a sound or just position. They are exploiting their own privilege and the gaps that THEY benefit from to grow their support.
Their victimhood is a sham. Their claim to reasonability is a sham. They rely upon tactics of popularism:

And JAQing

And false equivalence


You don’t need to find the golden racist quote to prove to anyone that they are *actually* racist and you know what even if you did – their supporters would simply overlook you anyway.

Because. They’re. Racist.

And if there’s one thing we can take from the broad support they enjoy in Aotearoa – it’s that, to quote a favoured NZ son: New Zealand is racist AF. It’s a truth that many have found hard to accept. A truth that people will deny, to the point where they will attack those who speak it.

How racist is it?
It’s so racist – that the immigration minister went out of his way to allow these white supremacists to bypass the laws that would have protected us from them, and allowed them into the country (whilst simultaneously withholding consent for human rights speakers of colour to enter).
It’s so racist – that racists can not only ascend to leadership roles in our communities, but, as councillors, feel safe to joke over lunch in council chambers that Captain Cook didn’t kill enough of our ancestors when he first landed (he only murdered 9 that time).

It’s so racist – that the government pours tens of millions of dollars into celebrating the arrival of Cook for a whole year – whilst ignoring the genocidal dimensions of his voyages, and ignoring that the event and funding itself is an affirmation of Indigenous subordination and Colonial dominance.

It is racist AF.

And while the government might like to pat itself on the back for funding Pacific voyaging, art, and heritage projects under the greater structure of Cook Celebrations – it’s still subordination. Muskets, blankets, and trinkets, 2019 styles.

And while the supporters of the Captain Cook celebrations may like to fool themselves that the celebrations will allow for “greater understanding” between our cultures and even allow for “healthy debate” – the truth is that people do not decide their positions upon logic alone. The mere providing of a platform validates a narrative. It’s not what is said in an event – it’s what an event says. The opportunity to “educate” our Treaty partners is completely undermined by the depth and breadth of our racism. People see what they want to see, and what is subtly (and not so subtly) reaffirmed by the systems that surround them every day – they will see that we are celebrating Cook, and therefore are celebrating, and validating white dominion.

And as much as the anonymous racist councillors, Don Brashes, Lauren Southerns, and Bob Joneses of the world make a fuss over the term racism – I’m much more concerned with the fact that so few are willing to recognise the erasure of historical genocide, and clear perpetuation of genocidal longing, being peddled all around us. We, as a nation, have somehow found ourselves in a place where someone who has repeatedly insulted and degraded Māori is able to carry a knighthood. We have somehow arrived at a space where even local politicians can lament in chambers that more Māori weren’t killed. We have arrived to a space where someone can seek to legitimise Indigenous murder, and still – it is not hate speech.

When our country seeks to defend the champions of Indigenous erasure and murder to this extent – you know we are very much living in an age of Indigenous genocide.

We got work to do.


When Ani Zhou Black came forward on Saturday, with her live testimony on Facebook regarding her husband’s pedophilia – Te Ao Māori was rocked.

They were huge revelations. Not just of his own personal deeds, but implicating him in the leadership of pedophile rings, both local and national. Not often you see a totara fall twice, and there are many still struggling to make sense of it all.

When Ani Zhou Black came forward on Saturday – she did so to present victims far and wide, many who may be outside of her immediate contact, with an opportunity to speak about the abuse they experienced, with the support of Ani and her family. That, in itself, is an incredibly selfless, and courageous act.

When Ani Zhou Black came forward on Saturday – she presented all of US with an opportunity, and it’s that opportunity that I think we should all be talking about now. Because as much as I support Ani’s stand – for the vast majority, this is not about her, or Awa, it’s about us all.

This is an opportunity for us to talk about sexual abuse in our communities – because it’s been happening for a long time now and it’s quite literally killing us.

First and foremost – as communities, we need to be carefully considering, right now, what we can do to create a safe space for our people to discuss sexual abuse. I don’t mean flinging names because you heard about something that someone heard about. The last thing we need this to amount to is a climate of further fear, and unnecessarily feeding people into a “justice” system that offers all of us anything but justice, is certainly not restorative, and is administered by perpetrators as well. The entire system itself needs to be assessed and investigated for its ability to respond to these cases.

We need to be creating safe spaces in our communities to talk about sexual abuse, because this is how we claim power back. I can speak plainly about my abuse, and my abuser, because he no longer has power over me, and has not done so for a very long time. The fear they leave with their victims is a part of their toolkit, and allows not only for them to continue, but for all pedophiles to continue. For as long as a community is NOT talking openly about sexual abuse and sexual boundaries – all pedophiles feel safe, and will continue to carry out their acts.

We need to be creating safe spaces in our communities to have conversations about sexual abuse that include the dimensions of historical trauma and colonialism, of toxic masculinity and power abuse, of mamae and tapu. I’m not talking about anyone escaping accountability – what I am talking about is the need for us to fully understand the drivers of this behaviour if we truly intend to break cycles.

This is an opportunity for us to reassess our ideas of leadership, and mana, and power structures. Because I’ve seen, myself, instances where power has been abused to psychologically bully communities into submission. I know that there are pedophiles on paepae, and on runanga, and very probably in every other leadership space you can imagine. Pedophiles are power abusers, and roles of authority are very attractive to them. Sexually deviant behavior is also entertained through the misogynistic “boys club”, and this prevails in the police, in law, the military, in governance, and sports. It’s high time we started reframing the jokes, language, and behavior associated with toxic masculinity, from “just being lads”, towards an understanding that these are serious markers of harmful behavior that fall short of the leadership we need and deserve.

In fact, these questions are ones that we can all challenge ourselves with, as well, because this is an opportunity for us to talk, as a community, about what we can all be doing better, to put an end to these cycles. How are we unwittingly enabling this culture of silence, how are we maintaining barriers to open discussion? How do we respond when someone comes forward? Particularly when it relates to someone we all know and care about? Does your personal closeness with them count as evidence in their favour? Take it from me on that last question – no. Pedophiles are masters of deception. You can be the best of friends with them for many years and they will walk straight into your house and sexually abuse your child then walk out like it never happened. In fact they count on the skill of deception to acquire such opportunities. I’m not saying every allegation is true… but that statements like “But I’ve known him so many years and there was never any hint…” are completely irrelevant – because they are THAT good at hiding. Whatever other evidence there may be to support them – your personal knowledge of them does not count.

This is an opportunity for us to once again look at the narratives of sexuality that surround our children and youth. From our virtually non-existent sexual health education in schools to the complete lack of support for sexual health discussions in homes, to hyper-sexualised media and native costuming. The fetishizing of native bodies has been documented over. And over. And over again. It’s happening in the Pacific, it’s happening in Aotearoa, it makes targets out of native children and we need to knock it on the head.

There’s a lot we can do, and it will take us moving past being passive commentators to being active agents in our communities. We need to move beyond talking about what others should be doing, accept what others simply can’t (and won’t) do and start talking about what WE can do. We also need to move beyond the individual to talk about what we can do better as a community.  Of course I support Ani – but I don’t agree with a hashtag campaign that centers this issue on Ani. Not least because these kinds of hashtags can have the unintended consequence of creating a target. This is not just about Ani, and it’s not just about Awa – it’s about all of us as a community. If we make it about individuals, spotlight them, and heroicize them (admirable as they are) – we are creating a context for other people to come forward for the wrong reasons. That doesn’t help genuine victims (in fact false cases make it much worse for genuine victims to be believed and supported). That doesn’t help us as a community, and it certainly doesn’t help the many whānau that are impacted.

I hope this is the time for us to start having some real conversations about what we can do, and what we must do, as well as what the government can’t currently do. I’m generally a cynical tart – but I really do believe in our communities to deal with this, and start some proper conversations. I was chatting with an Uncle about what has happened, just today… and he asked me, straight up:  “Well girl, has this happened to you?”
So I answered, straight up: “Yep”
And matter of factly he responded: “Well same here…”
And then we both went on to chat about what it all meant for our lives, and I gotta say – it was so. damn. refreshing. No shame, no awkwardness, just two people who want better for our community, reflecting on our truth. I wish more people could talk from our truth that way, without the awkwardness. I hope more of these kinds of conversations happen in our communities, and I pray for healing, for all of us.

Nau mai te ao. Ko tēnei te wā.

Tīhei, mauri ora.

(ps adding this FB post because, well, read it.)

Sex, Filth, Violence, and the Pacific

A text on exploitation.



I’ve just returned home from Fiji – I went to celebrate the wedding of a good friend to a lovely Fijian lad – and met with some of our voyaging and zero waste whanau to talk rubbish and solidarity… to experience some truly inspirational local sustainable tourism ventures, and to see friends.

Screenshot 2018-06-30 at 22.08.52 - Edited

It was my first time in Fiji. I sighed, a lot. Sometimes in awe – often in sadness, because what I saw, I see in so many places across our beautiful Moananui a Kiwa.

Fiji the beautiful, and afflicted. Look up at the beautiful sunsets and swaying palms….


36031844_10156479273899299_901746942348886016_nLook down at the endless tides of plastic washing up on the sand.

Fiji, the one night stand of tourism hoards, descending down the ocean-liner gangways like a conveyor belt of consumption, all pink skin and loud shirts, overburdened infrastructures creaking under their weight.


Fiji, sweetheart of extractive, exploitative resorts, where beautiful local people – the true architects of your experience – are charged out for their services at $60/hr by foreign owners and paid just $3/hr in return.

Fiji, where people come to escape the problems of their lives, and ignore the problems of Fijian lives.

Fiji, playground for some, hunting ground for others… just like the rest of our region – 250 odd years of dusky Pacific maidens being leered at and preyed upon by predominantly older white men, with military backgrounds… our women, our lands, our waters, all things used to satiate their ingrained R&R desires.

It’s heartbreaking – but it’s also the Pacific, in a cowrie shell.

As a region, the Pacific has always underwritten the consequences of the West’s behaviour.

The RIMPAC exercises being held off the coast of Hawai’i, and held every two years, is possibly one of the most extreme cases of this. New Zealand has been participating in these exercises since 2012 (here’s a previous blog detailing the growth of the US/NZ military relationship in recent years).

Over a month, armed forces from 26 nations, including 25,000 personnel, 47 ships, 5 submarines, and more than 200 aircraft will engage in wargames that will be hosted by the US Navy, upon stolen lands and waters.

These wargames include live fire, missile launches, microwave and sonar weaponry that destroys coral reefs, sea mammals, turtles. Over 5 years of these weaponry tests marine ecologists tracked over 9 million instances of death or injury to marine wildlife.

Every two years pilot whales and turtles wash ashore in high numbers during RIMPAC exercises.

The optics around the event are quite consistent – with the most common phrasing being that RIMPAC reinforces the US, and world, commitment to a “free and open Indo-Pacific”.

But of course, the majority of the Pacific is not free. Hawai’i is not free. Guahan is not free. Aotearoa is not free. Tahiti is not free. Tokelau is not free. Australia is not free. Canada is not free. West Papua is certainly not free. And were we to pursue our right to freedom – it will be these very armed forces that are enacted against us.

In fact we should never forget that these are the same naval forces that are authorised by the Maritime Crimes Amendment Bill to attack us in defence of the oil companies that we would protest against. The same naval forces in Israel that kill Palestinian fishermen and block aid for Palestinians in need. The same naval forces that protect the immoral, genocidal occupation of West Papua, blocking support for Indigenous West Papua peoples with “lethal force”.

These armed forces are the brutal fists of imperial occupiers.

Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Colombia, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of the Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tonga, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Vietnam.

This is not about protecting the freedom of the Pacific. It is about the maintenance and extension of colonial agendas. It is about the defence of extraction from Indigenous territories, theft of Indigenous lands, and the continued exertion of power over Indigenous Peoples.

The men of these armed forces will come ashore between exercises and, as has always be the case, will be responsible for spikes in sex trafficking and violent sexual assaults.

Screenshot 2018-06-30 at 21.32.37 - Edited

The sexual exploitation of women and children has featured in a recreational, and functional sense, at the heart of the military in the Pacific from its very origins. The two are inextricable from each other. At every military base in the Pacific, you will find heightened instances of sexual assault – the Pacific has been hyper-sexualized for the pleasure of crews, troops and tourism hoards since… well since the days of Cook really.

That is because we, the Pacific, as people and place, are viewed as commodities by the West.

Our people, lands and waters are commodities – used and tossed aside once fantasies are fulfilled. Stolen out from under us and used as training grounds for conflicts instigated by settler colonial governments in pursuit of power and resources. Packed full with toxic nuclear and chemical weaponry waste. Overburdened with the rubbish of consumerist hoards that it simply cannot sustain. Hocked out to foreign tourism investors that economically expel the righteously outraged occupants, replacing them with temporary escapees – who will only look up at the swaying coconut palms and pretty sunsets. Tourism providers that capitalise upon the fantasy package, constructed from the R&R culture of the military. Providers that enable and protect the continuation of rape and theft through hypersexualisation and spiritual denigration of our culture. Time and time again, the Pacific underwrites the decisions and behaviours of the West, with our resources, with our worlds, with our bodies.

So when I sat at the bar, in Fiji, and watched the middle aged, pink faced, sweaty, sleazy ex-military man preying upon young women I saw all of us, and all of our islands. And all of our mothers.

When I looked at the plastic rubbish flipping about in the waves as they lapped against the shores, I saw all of our waters, I saw all of our shores.

And what is happening right now, in Hawai’i, is happening to all of us.

We must, we simply must, stand up to RIMPAC, just as we must stand up to all exploiters.

From the leery predators, to the foreign tourism providers that court, couch, and enable them.

And we MUST call out our own governments for their participation in these abhorrent wargames.

Because if time is up on the exploitation of women, then it must surely also be up on the exploitation of our region.


That Time The Racist Tried to Bully a Professor and Twitter went BERSERK.


Anyone else get a deep sense of satisfaction when bullying backfires?

Oh you’re gonna love this then.

So back in February, this famously racist old white guy wrote another one of his famously racist columns, reckoning (as racist old white men do) that all Māori should spend the national commemorative day in service to white people – who brought them civilization.

​Source: Reddit via
You can imagine how that went down. The website eventually removed the column:
Screenshot 2018-06-15 at 16.40.29 - Edited
Turns out, racist old white guy has a knighthood, and so in no time at all, filmmaker Renae Maihi kicked off a petition to have him stripped of his knighthood, for hate speech. To date, it has 73 thousand signatures and counting.
And of course, racist old white guy did as racist old white men do (particularly rich ones), and has threatened her with legal action. But racist old guy did not stop there.
Māori Professor and researcher Leonie Pihama was just one of the many well known New Zealanders who tweeted her support of Renae, tweeting the hashtag #BobJonesIsARacist.

Sure enough, lawyers were soon in touch with Ms Pihama as well – sending the following:



Grab your popcorn here’s where it gets good….

Rather than respond directly, Leonie posted the letter on her blog, and with surgical precision, outlined the age old craft of SLAPP – where rich people abuse the legal system to silence the underprivileged.
Well NZ Twitter wasn’t havin’ it… commence tweet storm:


His lawyers weren’t safe either….

And as if the hashtag weren’t enough – New Zealand turned him into his own movie genre.

And so, far from retracting the tweet – the letter resulted in two national twitter trends:

And in probably the best sum of up why this is the greatest backfire of the year:

Pākeha Entitlement to Moko Kauwae, and Other Territorial Incursions.

Screenshot 2018-05-23 at 17.12.04
So I’ve shared a lot on this blog. Nothing that I’ve been uncomfortable with, but a lot that has come about as a part of my path, and although I can’t deny in many cases it’s been healing, I would say that in nearly every case, the defining point about whether to share something about my own world, has been whether it would benefit others or not.

At times, I’ve considered writing about moko kauwae, as I’m often asked about them, I guess because of mine – and it’s never quite felt like the time.

Now feels like the time.

An online “debate” (that’s pākeha media speak for an assault on Māori that we’re standing up to) is raging – instigated by a pākeha woman who has assumed the right to wear a moko kauwae. And Māori men who assumed the right to grant it to her.

There are those who would support her access to this realm of Wahine Māori:


There are many more OF that realm that would not:


Screenshot 2018-05-23 at 18.11.28

Screenshot 2018-05-23 at 17.17.09

One thing is not up for debate. It is a Wāhine Māori realm. And not unlike other territories – we have plenty of our own who would justify giving it away. Some might cite historical context (ie pākeha ancestor XYZ was gifted territory back in the day). Some might say Māori cannot look after their own territory so why not give it away. Some would say that our ancestors would not be happy with how we look after our territory so perhaps we shouldn’t have it, or occupy it, or indeed have no right to defend it.

These are not new, or novel, positions. We have heard every justification for giving our territory away in the past, we have seen plenty of cases where individuals have subverted collective territorial rights – and it has caused no less than war. Oh yes, historically we have given… and given… and given… and we have had far much more taken… and yet still, the bottomless appetite of the colonizer sends them back for more. For these reasons, in this contemporary context, we are charged to hold on to what territory we have left. I have no intention of giving away any more territory. I also have no intention of ceding authority to men, or tane, or non-Māori over this, Wāhine Māori, territory.

But what I really want to write about is this notion of what it takes for Wāhine Māori to “deserve” moko kauwae, because now, more than ever, I am seeing a lot of judgement on Wāhine Māori flying around the place. And I reiterate that this is in relation to WĀHINE MĀORI.

There are statements that infer, or outright declare, that Wāhine Māori should be examining their own behaviour or pathways before they take on moko kauwae.

Statements that outline what is acceptable for a Wāhine mau moko to do, or what she MUST do now that she has taken up this birthright.

Statements about how much Wāhine must achieve in other peoples’ eyes, or how much she must contribute to her community before she takes up her birthright.

There really is no way to make these kinds of statements without first making a judgement about Wahine in general and that is…

That in your natural state of Wāhine – you are not enough.

That as a member of a line of wahine who descend down from Hina – you are not enough. That as a survivor of multiple generations of attempted genocide, as a survivor of this very specific battleground of settler colonial racism and patriarchy – you are not enough. That as a vessel for the continuation of our existence as Māori – you are not enough.

And to that I say:

E Hine, You ARE enough

Now I can say that to you from where I am sitting – but the most important point is that you believe this, inside of yourself. Over the years since receiving mine, I have been asked many times by other Wāhine about my moko kauwae journey. Unfailingly this has been because they too are on a journey of their own. And I have my journey, and my story – but that is mine. It is not theirs… and so my response has been quite consistent – be at peace with your decision. I say that not as a prerequisite for deserving anything – but as a measure of self-protection. Because only you will awaken, in your skin, in the middle of the night, with your thoughts, with your angels, and your demons. Only you can defend your heart from the barbs of others. If you are truly at peace with your decision, at peace as a Wāhine Māori, then you will be fine. If not, well there is very little that will mess you up like wearing the tohu of your ancestors on your face and feeling that you don’t actually deserve it.

It’s a sad thing that so many people, right now, are prone to sit in judgement of each other, and at times of their own, in this sense – because it amounts to a bully mentality. When teaching children not to bully, we consistently ask them to consider that the person they seek to bully lives in a world much larger than that you see. That the little girl who you tease for wearing broken glasses lives in poverty. That the boy you make fun of for stuttering is actually healing from being severely abused. That the child who cries easily has just lost a parent. Yet here we are with grown adults who still seem very prone to judging Wāhine Māori based on their own observations and values.

So when I hear people’s anecdotes of this Wāhine Maumoko they saw down the pub, drunk, or that one they saw with a glazed look in her eye, or another that was in trouble with the law well… you just sound like the same old bully making a judgement, to me. Wāhine Māori deserve aroha on our winning days, and on our challenging ones, and that is the case whether we are wearing a moko or not. We deserve aroha on our learning journey not just at the end of it. So rather than judge, how about extend aroha and realise you may not know the full picture, nor is it for you to sit in adjudication of any Wāhine Māori in relation to their own birthright. How do you KNOW what her relative contributions have been in the past, are on any other day of the week, and will be tomorrow? What do you know of her reo journey? Where is your yardstick for what counts as a valid contribution? I have heard EVERYTHING in fact here’s a list of some of other peoples’ prerequisites. Most of these come from men, or Wāhine who DON’T wear moko:

  • You have to have te reo (although nobody seems to know exactly how well so I guess they’ll need to develop a test for that one).
  • You have to be post-menopause (no doubt because menstrual blood is “icky”)
  • You have to have experienced loss, death (I don’t know if killing idiots counts but that could potentially be solved immediately if someone is saying this to you).
  • You have to have esteemed whakapapa/genealogy (just as well everyone descends from a Māori princess).
  • You have to have contributed significantly to your community – which apparently must take the form of… a degree from a university, or a lifetime of public service, maybe not so much driving the kura bus, or, you know… producing the next generation.
  • You have to karanga now (I have no idea if this meant you have to move home to your marae or should knock on the door of the local marae and introduce yourself as their new kaikaranga or if one is meant to just burst into karanga at any given moment on the street).
  • You cannot put anything unclean into your mouth which apparently relates to:
    • Alcohol
    • Drugs (I guess the non-prescripted kind)
    • Tobacco
    • A Penis (no really this has been said I kid you not and apart from the very obvious point that many members of the male community are quite clean – It should also be noted that for many women, this wouldn’t at ALL be sacrifice. In fact for some it might be a reason to get it. One thing’s for sure… even if that was the case, which it’s not, I don’t know any who would say “ohhh dang I was gonna get my moko kauwae but I just can’t possibly give up playing the skin flute it’s my fave!”)

So anyway… I could go on I’ve heard a bunch of conditions and they’re all very colourful. Depending on who you’re talking to and what they value, be it your parenting, your whakapapa, your commitment to the environment, or your community, or te reo… they all have their little lists that they like to put forward. If you tried to fulfil them all you would never succeed, not least because some of them cancel each other out. But there come times in your life when you must abandon the need to please others, because it’s not them that must live, and die with your moko. It is you. He hoa mate MŌU. In death, and in life, through the ups and the downs, through your messed up days, your bad decisions, your good ones. Through your learning journey, through your ongoing contribution as a Wāhine Māori. We survive the onslaught of settler colonialism, and the onslaught of racist feminists and faux spiritualists who assume themselves our sisters until they don’t get what they want from us, and then they go on the attack….


Just a snippet of what Wahine are subjected to by Päkeha women when Māori men grant this access to our territory and we dare to challenge it


We survive the onslaught of patriarchal misogyny and toxic masculinity not only from others, but also from our own. We survive the attacks of men, and women, every time we are placed in a position by our own brothers to have to defend our territory. We survive to see another day, to pass the legacy of our ancestors forth to another generation, to protect, and reclaim, our territories and birthrights.

We survive.

And so with every breath you take you contribute. Your existence, in a genocidal settler colonial state, is an act of resistance.

You, e Hine, are enough.

By the incomparable Dayle Takitimu xx


Hey Cook – FAQ

In two weeks, I will be attending the United Nations Permanent Forum for Indigenous Issues, to place before them the issue of the 2019 celebrations of Captain Cook’s arrival in Aotearoa (and the Pacific). My objections to this event are anything but news to those that know me, or have read my blog – I’ve published on this numerous times, and spoken at a number of venues regarding the surrounding issues. Naturally – the issues raised by these objections don’t go unchallenged. While there are many of us who object to these proceedings – there are, still, many others who would like to see them go ahead. For those who may read or hear about this in the coming weeks, and feel the need to pose a question or two, I’ve compiled the following FAQ list, with responses.

Oh also, probably a good time to wave out now to my most recent followers from Ministry for Culture and Heritage and let you know that yes – you can expect more resistance. We’re only just getting started.

Ok so here we go – the Cook Celebrations FAQ:

1. Cook was on a science mission though… wasn’t he?
The observation of the transit of Venus was a convenient cover for Britain’s moves to secure trading posts, military stations, and the claiming of lands and resources in the name of the Crown. The 1700s was still well within this period of time known as “The Age of Discovery” – probably better termed from an Indigenous perspective as the Age of Genocide. Driven by the Discovery Doctrine, which arose out of medieval law discourse around the reach of the church and the duties of discovery and conversion, explorers were essentially accorded divine rights for exploration, and claiming of new territories, with any non-christian inhabitants being considered part of the land, and able to be claimed as territory. Converting them to christianity was considered to be doing “god’s work”. By the time the mid 1700s came around there were Spaniards, French, and Dutch “explorers” positioning themselves around the Pacific in their own little imperial race.

When the Royal Navy sent Cook on the Bark Endeavour, they knew that declaring their true intentions could result in others beating them to their goal – and so the cover of a science expedition was handy to position Cook in the South Pacific without betraying their intentions. The Bark Endeavour was a military vessel, captained by a Naval Lieutenant, equipped with 10 four pound cannons and 12 swivel guns, not for science, but for Imperial expansion.

2. It’s commemorations! Not celebrations…
Semantics. You’re basing a year long series of events, and investing millions of dollars, around your own arrival to this land when the people most impacted by that arrival still struggle significantly from those impacts. A year of events and millions of dollars, while our true history still cannot be taught in our schools, and the government fails to address children going to school with no food. A year of events while whānau of Edgecumbe await adequate housing a year after the floods, while whānau all over our country face another approaching winter without adequate housing, or heating. The fact that numerous newspapers, and even our own local council, can’t seem to avoid calling it celebrations exposes the commemoration tag as a thin veneer.


Truth is, as a nation, we are nowhere near being ready to hold this discussion, and to do so leapfrogs the primary discussion of our Indigenous rights. Commemoration, celebration, whatever the hell you want to call it – it’s not appropriate to be spending this much money on an event about your own arrival to our land. You have $15million handy? Give it to us come October 9th, along with an apology, an acknowledgement that this is just the scratch on the surface of what is required, and a commitment to start handing power and lands back and then we can talk. In fact why put off til then what you can do right now.

3. It happened 250 years ago, shouldn’t you be over it by now?
Oh how I’d love for it to have stopped 250 years ago. Maybe if we’d shared some of the qualities of our Hawaiian relations, it would have.

The privilege of an inconsequential past belongs to those who still live off the benefits of how it played out.

For those of us who have survived a consistent, multigenerational experience of racism, from the theft of our lands and displacement of our ancestors, and the imposition of an illegitimate settler government, through to acts of cultural genocide – all of these rights violations have multi-generational impacts, and all of them are rooted in the entitlement assumed under the Doctrine of Discovery. These same rights violations are still relevant and present today. Our government still assumes rights it has never been accorded through our “founding document”. Pull the thread of Britain’s right to be here at all, of their assumption that they provide us with civilisation and protection, of their right to make the decisions about our lands, resources, rights and lives, and the very foundations of our own government begins to unravel. It’s a huge issue, which is why Discovery Doctrine issues are so rarely addressed, and why they still need to be addressed. What Cook did held impacts for our entire nation of Maori, and further afield, held impacts for our relations right across Te Moananui a Kiwa.

4. But he was one of the good guys!
Captain Cook’s voyages around the Pacific have often been characterised as adventures where he engaged in mutually beneficial relationships, admiring the people he encountered, trading hospitably with them – he’s often portrayed as the honourable and fair scientist-cum-explorer. Yet in his own journals he details stealing from Indigenous communities when he comes across their homes unattended – but shooting, killing, and abducting those who would dare to steal from him when he arrives uninvited to their lands and waters (and being the judge jury and executioner when anything went missing). He quite evidently didn’t admire the people of Niue which he named “Savage Island”, and also evidently didn’t admire my own region which he titled “Poverty Bay” – of course these names revolved entirely around what he wasn’t able to get from us rather than any intrinsic value. Here again, we see the erasure of native title simply in the assumption to name a place that already clearly has a name.

Cook also, of course, used deadly force whenever he felt he was under attack, and as was the case in Turanga, his perception of attack may well at times have been a matter of miscommunication – but EVEN IF IT WAS that he was under threat, that is a perfectly predictable and reasonable response to an invader, arriving without invite on other people’s shores with no actual entitlement other than that of his own Crown. It has always been quite within our rights to defend our own territories from invaders so let us never forget who was taking the action out here – Cook was imposing himself upon our territories and had no right to exert deadly force upon us for defending our territories as we saw fit.

But it was not merely within the scope of retribution or miscommunication that Cook took Indigenous lives, in fact he also detailed within his own journals the murder of unarmed Indigenous peoples merely because he desired to get a better look at the vessel they were sailing at the time. In plain terms, he committed piracy. Multiple times.

These particular pirates did not just pillage and plunder but they also infected swathes of Pacific populations with sexually transmitted diseases such as syphilis and gonorrhea, and in fact was responsible for the introduction of sexually transmitted diseases to Aotearoa, Hawai’i, and many other Pacific nations, by some crewmembers accounts with girls as young as 9. It’s widely known that Cook, himself, died ridden with syphilis. Alongside tuberculosis these diseases were responsible for huge population losses, hence in many places by Indigenous peoples Cook is remembered as a syphilitic pedophile rather than an honourable explorer. Comparing explorers who were all responsible for wiping out Indigenous populations is hardly a yardstick for morality. So who were the good guys? Well – in this context, I’d say the good guys were the ones that stayed at home.

5. But there are Maori taking part – they’re getting to tell their story and celebrate their histories too.
So first of all – Maori participation is not an indicator of justice for Maori – the Ture Whenua Maori Review quite clearly demonstrates that. But secondly – we are not a hive mind. Some value the Treaty, some do not, some see the relevance in the Doctrine of Discovery, others are quite unaware of it. I cannot answer for those who have chosen to participate but I can say that any move to base an event around the arrival of colonization to these lands should NOT be initiated by pākeha, should NOT be led by pākeha, and should not have the pursestrings held by pākeha. So what is the choice here, given that it was initiated by pākeha, with an option for Māori to participate.

The option was participate or be absent.

And this, literally, is how I have had this situation presented to me by well-meaning pakeha involved with these events who had no idea of how absolutely traumatising it is to say to an Indigenous person:

“Well, it’s going to happen – so what would you like to do about it?”

And that, my friends, is the perfect example of the power dynamic that sits behind the Cook events. This is a chance to participate or be erased on your own land.

Can I blame anyone for insisting that their story be included? No. Does that make this a JUST scenario? NO.

There are still others who revel in the fact that this is “shining a light” on the Pacific, on Aotearoa, that it brings with it unprecendented interest in our region and a desire to learn more about us (and even now I cannot write that without sighing deeply).

Let’s be clear about this – we, Indigenous Peoples, Māori, and all Ocean Peoples – do NOT need Cook in order to celebrate ourselves. We have done so, and will continue to do so. Pasifika Festival, Matatini Performing Arts Festival, Te Maori… we don’t need to wait for Cook to come along in order to celebrate who we are. In fact – we should probably all at this point be asking some very important questions: Who is it exactly that is just now showing interest in our region and ourselves? Why now as opposed to any other time? Whose gaze are we courting, and for whose ultimate benefit? No, I’m going to suggest that the heightened interest in this region is the misinterpretation of a greater interest in the colonial narratives of discovering and conquering this region. This, combined with the peddling of Indigenous acceptance makes for a much more palatable version of our history – a story where fragile white settler descendants can feel “safe” to engage in what happened, and is still happening, on these lands. That is what people are engaging in. For Māori – given that we CAN celebrate ourselves any time – why should we be basing any celebration of ourselves around the arrival of the forces that have sought to undo everything we are from that point onwards? Especially when it allows our colonizer to pat himself on the back for “providing the opportunity” and ultimately provides a free pass for our colonizer to leapfrog past restoration of due rights to a pretense of “reconciliation”. When our lands and waters are returned along with the ability to govern ourselves on our lands and waters… then we can begin the discussion of reconciliation. There is no shortcut. Which brings me to the next common line…

6. But this is a great opportunity for us to reconcile our pasts and move on together!

This… THIS is really rich. Like.. that bitter, embattled “HA!” kind of rich, when someone makes a suggestion that is as insulting as it is myopic. Māori have been dragging our Treaty partner back to the table to remind them of their obligations under the document THEY drafted, since before the ink was dry. In each instance, our Treaty partner has sought to curtail our efforts. Opportunities exist for reconciliation every single day in this country, and every single day we still see racism in the media, racism in our council representation, racism in our government, racism in our schools.

What good old NZ media counts as humour (and which our own Human Rights Tribunal also thinks is not harmful to Maori/Pacific peoples).

Even the incredibly flawed Treaty settlement process sits underneath a Crown power structure which still resists our own historical truths and calls for justice. Every week I go to gatherings that essentially boil down to us dealing with the impacts of colonization and every week our Treaty partner leaves us to deal with that alone. Every one of those gatherings is a missed opportunity for the descendants of colonizers to attend, to hear the impacts, and to consider how they can help to restore justice. You want to reconcile? Come hikoi with us. Support our kura kaupapa and kohanga reo. Learn our reo. Call for the return of our lands. Call for our right to govern ourselves. Call for pākeha to exit their positions of power and hand them over to us, and support us in our journey for the restoration of our rights, and our agency, in our land. But no – you want to ignore those material opportunities and call THIS our opportunity to reconcile. An opportunity that affords you the right to celebrate yourselves, and then us too – because that, apparently, is how to do “bi-cultural”.

There are so many ways you can enter into the discussion of reconciliation.

But centering an event around the day that your lot arrived here, initiatied by you, with options for us to participate – that’s not it.

7. What’s this got to do with the environment?

If we’re talking about Cook – well, when Cook returned to Europe, and even during his travels, as he spread word of the resources he encountered in various lands it unfailingly led to intrusions from further traders, or military invasions and theft, and subsequent resource depletion and in some cases, the wiping out of food systems and staple stocks for Indigenous communities. Of course this fault lies not only with Cook but also with those that followed after him – and in both cases, again, we see this imperial entitlement, this socialised, normalised philosophy of entitlement to Non-christian territories and resources encapsulated by the Discovery Doctrine, that persists to this day. So the answer is: Everything. The Doctrine of Discovery has EVERYTHING to do with the environment. It was developed with the dispossession of Indigenous lands and resources in mind. The Discovery Doctrine facilitated the rechannelling of resources and wealth to European empires. From that point on, the claiming of lands, which was necessary in order to set up settler governments, removed power from the people who lived in an interdependent relationship with those lands and waters, and placed that power in a central location that could reap the benefits of its use without being subject to the impacts of its degradation. And that is how governments continue to operate today – in a centralised fashion, viscerally dissociated from the harm they cause, re-channelling power and resources to a core group. The empires they serve were once monarchies, and are now corporations – who operate under the very same entitlement to impact upon our lands, waters and even our own children and bodies as if we were simply a part of the booty that they stole. Our government stole ten thousand hectares of land from Maori hands through the Foreshore and Seabed Act NOT because the Treaty allowed it to do so, but because the Doctrine of Discovery empowered it to do so. Oil industries plunder our seabed and lands not because of a Treaty-led government – but because of a Doctrine of Discovery led government. Our waterways are dying not because of a government that honours Te Tiriti, but because of colonial entitlement that erases Indigenous presence and voices, as per the Doctrine of Discovery. If the Treaty was the tenancy agreement of the Crown to remain in Aotearoa – then it begs the question why can it still remain after so many breaches? The answer is The Discovery Doctrine.

8. But… why the United Nations?
The Permanent Forum for Indigenous Issues sits within the UN, under the ECOSOC council, to hear specific issues pertaining to Indigenous peoples around the world. Where governments fail to recognise the rights of Indigenous Peoples, or in the instance where issues supercede one government and impact upon the broader Indigenous community, the Permanent Forum is there for these issues to be recorded in the global accounts. Upon occassion, recommendations may be elevated to General Assembly, or rapporteurs may be appointed to investigate an issue. The Doctrine of Discovery may not be that well discussed in Aotearoa – but in the Permanent Forum it’s recognised as the underpinning theme for Indigenous dispossession. So much, so, in fact, that a special session was held around the Doctrine of Discovery, and the resulting report from the Permanent Forum for Indigenous Issues reaffirmed that “all doctrines, including the doctrine of discovery, that advocate superiority on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust and should be repudiated in word and action.”

So while the NZ government might not realise the rights transgressions of an event which does anything less than completely repudiate Cook’s acts as vile and immoral – the UN Permanent Forum certainly does, and that’s where this needs to be presented, as a record of NZ’s response to the recommendations of 2014. In addition to this – we already know of instances overseas that seek to use these celebrations as a template for their own celebrations. Our brothers and sisters of Australia will also be subjected to a government imposing Cook celebrations upon them, will also be told that it will be in their own best interests, will also have government-sponsored participation from members of their communities, in spite of Cook’s declaration of “Terra Nullius” – unoccupied land, which led to subsequently being subjected to horrific abuses and murder. Other Indigneous nations are also facing re-enactments of the arrival of colonizers – this issue of governments celebrating the arrival of the colonizer is a huge, unnecessary sap of energy and resources that could so much more effectively be spent on simply getting on with the business of reclaiming our freedom.

9. What do you hope to achieve/What do you want to see happen?
First and foremost – for the records to show that this did not go unchallenged. Secondly, for those that have spent so many years working to elevate social consciousness around the Doctrine of Discovery to have their work acknowledged and built upon, as a legacy for future Indigenous generations to carry on with.

To be honest – I would like to wake up in 2019 and have this be another year where we progress as Indigenous people towards our sovereign rights, not some other shifted goal of “celebrated dual heritage”. Let Cook rest in the shadows of history as the murderous, thieving, kidnapping, diseased pirate that he was, and let the rest of us just get on with elevating our own Indigenous stories on our own terms and timeframes.

Koina noiho. That’s why I’m going. If you’d like to contribute towards the trip – here’s the crowdfunding page. MCH – feel free to fund me! It’s be a nice step towards reconciliation 😉